NQ Futures Position Size Calculator
Work out exactly how many contracts to take on NQ, MNQ, ES, and the other prop-firm futures. Risk a fixed percentage of your account, let the math size the trade.
How the math works
Position size for futures comes down to three numbers: the dollars you're willing to lose, the stop distance in points, and the dollar value of one point on that contract. The formula is contracts = (account × risk%) ÷ (stop points × $ per point). For NQ at $20/point with a 20-point stop, one contract risks $400. On a $50,000 account at 1% risk ($500), that gives you one contract with room to spare — not two.
If you trade micros, the math changes by a factor of 10: MNQ is $2/point, so a 20-point stop risks $40 per contract. The same $500 budget buys 12 MNQ contracts. Micros exist so prop firm traders with $2,500 trailing drawdowns can actually hold positions without one tick killing the account.
Why 1% per trade on futures
Futures leverage is already extreme — a single NQ contract controls roughly $350,000 of notional exposure. The point of sizing is to tame that leverage back into something survivable. At 1% risk per trade on a prop firm eval, a 5-trade losing streak costs you 5%, which is close to the drawdown threshold on most firms. At 2% risk, that same streak is 10% — account-ending on every prop firm evaluation running today.
Prop firm examples
- Topstep $50k Combine. $50,000 balance, $2,000 max loss. At 0.5% risk ($250), a 10-point NQ stop is exactly one contract. That's the most size that lets you take 8 losing trades in a row and still pass.
- Apex $50k evaluation. $50,000 balance, $2,500 trailing drawdown. At 1% risk ($500), a 10-point NQ stop allows 2 contracts — one full R of risk on a single setup.
- Tradeify $25k. Smaller drawdown ($1,500) means you're almost always in MNQ territory. A 10-point MNQ stop at 0.5% risk is 6 contracts.
Common mistakes on futures
- Confusing ticks and points. NQ ticks are 0.25 points ($5). A "20-tick stop" is 5 points, not 20 points. Tick vs point mis-entry is the #1 sizing error.
- Sizing by contracts instead of by risk. "I always trade 2 NQ" is not a plan. Two contracts at a 30-point stop is $1,200 — that's 2.4% on a $50k account, well over any sensible limit.
- Tightening the stop to size bigger. Stops belong at structural invalidation points, not wherever makes your contract count look good. If a 10-point stop doesn't give you room to work, you're probably trading the wrong setup.
- Using E-minis when you need micros. If the calculator returns zero NQ contracts, switch to MNQ. That's what micros are for.